@helpImTrappedOnline@lemmy.world
Post #1786984
2026-04-22 12:31 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@grue@lemmy.world 2026-04-22 13:44
The Public Domain isn’t a “license.” It’s simply the default state of a work when copyright is no longer being enforced for it. I’m saying that copyright should immediately expire for any published work that is no longer being made available by some entity with the right to do so (phrased carefully so as not to break copyleft licenses, BTW) and that anyone should be able to get it directly from a government archive of all Public Domain works. As for selling Public Domain works, that’s always been allowed and I don’t see any particular reason to change it, provided that regulatory capture doesn’t result in the public archive being the digital equivalent of hidden away in a disused lavatory in a locked basement with a sign saying “beware of the leopard.” If the free option is prominent and well-known but you want to pay money for some reason anyway (in theory, because the person selling it added value in some way), that’s your business.
-
@CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-04-22 14:19
I'm going to hard disagree on NC. If the original publisher decided to dump their IP, and someone else has a good enough idea to make money off of it, they absolutely should. BY-SA gets you the same vibe and encourages the new IP to keep making new content and allows others to do the same.