2026-04-29 16:10 UTC
FastCGI: 30 Years Old and Still the Better Protocol for Reverse Proxies
https://www.agwa.name/blog/post/fastcgi_is_the_better_protocol_for_reverse_proxies
Replies (2)
-
@cks@mastodon.social 2026-04-30 15:48
@agwa I'm fond of the simpler SCGI, but FastCGI has the mindshare (and the implementations) and I entirely agree with you that it's better than HTTP.
-
@agwa@follow.agwa.name 2026-04-30 18:59
@cks I would like SCGI more if you could reuse connections. I don't mean multiplexing but just being able to send another request after the first one finishes.