Post #1774435
2026-03-10 13:01 UTC
So your take-away from this article about a surveillance tool that seeks patterns of behavior and movement amongst hundreds of random people in a public space is "those privileged men will do anything to remain unaccountable" for... minding their business on in the tube, mall, or sidewalk? This is waaaayyy bigger than that level of bigotry, and in fact pandering to that very bigotry is exactly the tool used to get 51% of the population on board with implementing it without considering the very real consequences for *them*.
Replies (2)
-
@QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world 2026-03-11 01:51
I misread the situation. Ignore what I said.
-
@starman2112@sh.itjust.works 2026-03-10 17:03
I think their point is that this technology will continue the trend of not making men take accountability for their actions. Expanding surveillance and preemptively arresting guys for being awkward does nothing to put guys like Brock Allen Turner (aka Brock Turner) (aka Allen Turner) in jail for raping people. Definitely better ways to phrase it though. A lot of people think that "forcing men to take accountability for their actions" means "forcing *all* men to take accountability for *all other* men's actions," but that's not really what they said