Post #1764042
2026-04-25 22:28 UTC
@rzeta0 "Both 89 and 197 are prime so..." ?
Replies (1)
-
@rzeta0@mathstodon.xyz 2026-04-25 23:20
@olegmar The textbook hasn't reached the point where we know that primes have primitive roots. It could be an error by the author who lost track of what we are supposed to know at each point in the book. Or maybe there is something deeper that I'm missing.