Post #1707626
2026-04-24 14:05 UTC
@rlegowski1 @daygar *cough* bet REAPER's is faster *cough*
Replies (2)
-
@rlegowski1@tweesecake.social 2026-04-24 14:11
@Scott @daygar hahahahahaha! Really don't want to laugh at the punctuation of coughs...but the way you did that was hilarious.
-
@x0@dragonscave.space 2026-04-24 15:32
@Scott @rlegowski1 @daygar It is, in fact. I'm not sure its individual encoders are much faster, but the decompression (decoder) step is definitely faster, and it can do parallel conversion. And I think a few versions ago it managed to achieve parity with GW's directory options. GW's is useful for certain kinds of edits, though. Not effects chains per se, but like, trim silence etc.