Post #1696006
2026-04-16 21:21 UTC
@fskornia I considered that, but that's not how it worked (for me)
Replies (2)
-
@markmalowany@mastodon.social 2026-04-16 21:26
@fskornia Eep! Forget that. I am terrible at predicting where an alphabetical list would land. Mea culpa! (I actually had to sort an alphabetical list of numbers 1-60 to see just how high 'fifteen' ranked)
-
@krnlg@mastodon.social 2026-04-16 21:28
@markmalowany At the very bottom of the page it shows the current position in the alphetically-ordered list. So it might say that the minute is 56/60, because "Twenty-Six" is the 56th in the list. Then the minute hand is rendered 56/60ths of the way around the dial (i.e. at what would be minute 56 in a normal clock). It took me a while to figure it out too.