Post #1672237

2022-11-14 10:26 UTC

@dazinism @rixx So you managed to democratically maintain and even enhance an #interphobic #coc. Instances like yours are why I went explicitly went out of my way to find an instance which included protections for people like me, which chaos.social has; in addition to the being a bunch of anarchists and geeks. You lot, however, have clearly derived your policy from the Contributor Covenant and its predecessor, the Geek Feminism Wiki policies. Both have the interphobia baked in (on purpose).

Replies (2)

@adversary@chaos.social 2022-11-14 10:29

@dazinism @rixx Anyway, you might not want to discuss this with me. As a public signatory to the Darlington Statement, I'm automatically in breach of your instance's CoC as intended by its original author from the GeekFeminism Wiki (I believe it is still online, but as an archive), Tim Chevalier. You can read the Darlington Statement here: https://darlington.org.au/statement/

Open ##1672238
@dazinism@social.coop 2022-11-14 20:07

@adversary Hey Ben, thanks for your comments. I joined #SocialCoop a short time before the CoC was developed and I followed the conversations during its development. There was a fair amount of tension with some members rejecting suggestions from marginalized groups Some members from marginalized groups left. Also other members left because they thought the CoC would limit their speech We followed suggestions from members, and other folks, whod been involved in running diverse online 1/? @rixx

Open ##1672240