Post #1655932

@tomstafford (2/2) Instead, radically shorten the proposal length, and spend the reviewer time for a basic quality grading: e.g. pointless / ok idea / great idea / excellent idea. If there is reviewer time to spare, use it for detailed suggestions *for the submitters* how to improve their proposal for the next round. Discard the "pointless" bucket, and put the rest into a weighted lottery. Tolerate the higher noise and embrace the larger diversity of projects it brings.