Post #1623142

2026-04-09 21:50 UTC

@Viss @Cs137 @WoodpeckerCI I suspect our CI usage would very quickly make codeberg not like us, it's probably too much given their size. Looks like woodpecker doesn't quite have the support for running full VMs, but I guess they do have a plugin architecture for that...

Replies (3)

@Viss@mastodon.social 2026-04-09 22:30

@AndresFreundTec @Cs137 @WoodpeckerCI it might be worth investigating fly.io, i think one of their leads is here on mastodon too - they might have some kinda 'if youre a big opensource project we can give you huge discounts and/or credits' deals

Open ##1623143
@nevonnen@mastodon.online 2026-04-11 15:42

@AndresFreundTec @Viss @Cs137 @WoodpeckerCI @Codeberg I'm pretty sure both Woodpecker and Forgejo Actions allow for self-hosted runners. That would shift the cost from codeberg to you, but it sounds like that wouldn't be a problem.

Open ##1623144
@WoodpeckerCI@floss.social 2026-04-11 16:43

@AndresFreundTec @Viss @Cs137 We currently have no native VM support, but this is only because of some open implementation questions: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/discussions/2302#discussioncomment-6775117 feedback is welcome! And writing a own backennd is easy and transparent to the server (so you could use #codeberg 's hosted CI and use own agents with custom backend ;) ) (You just have to implement this interface: https://github.com/woodpecker-ci/woodpecker/blob/main/pipeline/backend/types/backend.go)

Open ##1623145