Post #1615972
2026-03-22 18:50 UTC
Replies (5)
-
@colin_mcmillen@piaille.fr 2026-03-22 19:07
@dauphin1 Because it enables fascism. https://blog.bgcarlisle.com/2025/05/16/a-plausible-scalable-and-slightly-wrong-black-box-why-large-language-models-are-a-fascist-technology-that-cannot-be-redeemed/
-
@VoquiLeibbrandt@mastodon.social 2026-03-22 19:08
@dauphin1 @colin_mcmillen Last time was last art auction ?
-
@futureisfoss@fosstodon.org 2026-03-22 19:23
@dauphin1 @colin_mcmillen I don't think you understand what labor of love means, not everything is a competition which has to be won.
-
@ShadSterling@mastodon.social 2026-03-22 23:43
@dauphin1 @colin_mcmillen there are a lot of reasons, none of which have anything to do with opposing automation. It’s more about making automations that are usable, intelligible, maintainable, efficient, and so on, along with limiting resource consumption of development to the use of a single computer, and maintaining at least the possibility of respecting the rights of programmers as workers. Doing the opposite of any of those things is harmful; LLMs do the opposite of all of them
-
@lolow@mastouille.fr 2026-03-24 14:41
@dauphin1 @colin_mcmillen 1. dependency to external service (at least for the moment) 2. understanding of all your code base 3. "vibecoding" is really a shitty term, especially when we expect sofwares to give exact results - not "viby" results