Post #1607273
2026-04-23 05:13 UTC
I did read the whole article, it feels rambling, vague, and incoherent, with full of these classic talking points.
Like congratulations, in talking about AI, you somehow managed to shoehorn in - unhoused people, MAGA, labour value, worker solidarity, migration, the normalization of violence... you write like a tweaker.
Replies (1)
-
@naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2026-04-23 05:27
Well on your whole "it's just what's more common" this sort of entrenching of the "norm" as what is true is specifically one of the criticisms raised, so it seems strange to raise it as a defense, further much of the training data for all models is in english and reflects global north values and perspectives, particularly european and american because this is what has been digitised. He also writes about the issues with centralisation and control, disinformation, lack of consent, undermining of government accountability/devaluing of institutions and transparency. It seems weird to dismiss this all as "just use a distillation of chatgpt run by a chinese company".