Post #1554529

@coeurl <3 yeah like the way I see it, and I'm just one person: – misandry doesn't exist, thus trying to argue for a transmisandry isn't worth it especially when *we have other language available to describe being oppressed on the basis of ones transmasculinity* – if you read the original essay that defined transandrophobia there's points being made but it's all been hopelessly hijacked by bad faith readings at this point, and the relevant parts pf the analysis the term offered are also addressed by the term anti-transmasculinity – the term "transemasculation" was created by a non-transmasc who's expressed anti-transmasc sentiment in the past, I don't believe in anything about us, without us, especially when it comes from a nonBlack transfem who finds it easier to be in community with detransitioned transmasc people than transmascs ourselves, as we are – the term anti-transmasculinity is an intersectional term that is grounded in Black transfeminism, and I think this is a huge reason why everyone around these parts is reluctant to actually use it and instead wanna argue endlessly about trans/misandry