Post #1544722
2024-04-16 08:09 UTC
@agitatra @lispi314 @indigoparadox interesting thought – hadn't occurred to me!
Off the top of my head I'd guess the number of P521 users is _relatively_ small. As another commenter pointed out, it's never been PuTTY's default; and generally the NIST curves seem to have mostly gone out of fashion these days, in favour of Ed25519.
So I doubt this was _all_ the xz backdoor actors were after. It doesn't seem worth all the effort by itself. But it could have been one thing on their shopping list.
Replies (1)
-
@agitatra@berlin.social 2024-04-16 08:13
@simontatham @lispi314 @indigoparadox "Let no private key behind"...