Post #1521120
2022-12-16 20:33 UTC
@cfiesler right. i suspect there would be similar reactions even if the training data wasn't in question, which may be where this evolves anyway. the ethical question seems incredibly interesting, e.g., -- why shouldn't new artists be allowed into these markets, where their skills with subject choice/prompt engineering/touchups/etc can be appreciated and valued?
Replies (2)
-
@jbigham@hci.social 2022-12-16 20:33
@cfiesler "AI-generated art" is factually incorrect, IMO
-
@cfiesler@hci.social 2022-12-16 20:47
@jbigham I think this is true; see also: the art show winner from the fall. Though I'm hearing a LOT about training data, even if that's not the focus of this article. A lot of artists are really, really pissed off. Apparently there were images coming through the Magic Avatar thing that still had garbled versions of artists' signatures on them.