Post #1513708

@dysfun totally, it's a consequence of the system design. I guess maybe I'm trying to suggest that perhaps it's a suboptimal design. I realize that on the modern web there's only so much you can do to reign in JavaScript memory consumption, but I'm starting to wonder how far we *could* go, on both the browser and serving side. I've been fiddling with @jonmsterling's Forester system lately, which is lovely, and a stark reminder how good things can be with fairly things shipped to clients.