Post #1506852
2026-03-24 11:59 UTC
@cbaberle Excellent post summarizing a ton of work! (I have to admit I was a little nervous there would be no credit assigned —except to Ingo Blechschmidt, Felix Cherubini, Thierry Coquand, Matthias Hutzler, David Wärn, Hugo Moeneclaey— until I got to the end where all the references are! 😅)
One thing I noticed was wrong is this sentence: "For commutative rings A, B the homomorphisms A → B
are in natural bijection with continuous maps Spec(B) → Spec(A)."
This is very far from true! Take A = B = Z, for example. There is a unique ring homomorphism A → B but there are uncountably many continuous functions Spec(B) → Spec(A): fix 0 and permute the primes however you want amongst themselves.
One nearby correct statement is, of course, that you can equip the topological space Spec(A) with the structure of a scheme and then ring homomorphisms A → B are in natural bijection with morphisms of schemes Spec(B) → Spec(A).
Replies (2)
-
@jdw@mathstodon.xyz 2026-03-24 12:39
@oantolin @cbaberle I don't think you can map the primes however you want, there is still some topology going on. But you can, for example, permute them however you want.
-
@cbaberle@mathstodon.xyz 2026-03-24 14:25
@oantolin thanks for the correction. fixed!