Post #1502789
2026-04-21 20:27 UTC
If it’s finding valid vulnerabilities then it’s just another tool like static analysis, fuzzers and sanitizers. There definitely seems to be a difference in quality compared to earlier generations that were behind the sloppy avalanch of reports.
Replies (1)
-
@sem@piefed.blahaj.zone 2026-04-22 05:48
Instead of 271 vulns, it was more like 2 vulns, found 271 different times. Here’s a o good article about it https://www.flyingpenguin.com/the-boy-that-cried-mythos-verification-is-collapsing-trust-in-anthropic/