Elektrine lite

← Feed

@malteengeler@legal.social

Post #1499815

2026-04-15 15:35 UTC

@festal I personally don't feel encouraged by the promise of "random statistical nonsense but based on a more narrow set of data". I still consider it a problem that the model used as the base has all the integrated homogenisation - and applies it to the data set. The abstract is created from a limited set of text but the model used was trained on much bigger sets (I just checked but can't find what model they used. They didn't train one themselves on only sci-hub texts I assume).

Replies (1)

  • @festal@tldr.nettime.org 2026-04-15 16:05

    @malteengeler fair enough. It depends what you compare it to. I can see cases where I prefer this to sci-hub's traditional search interface. I know, that's a low bar, it seems the relevant one.

    Open ##1499816