Post #1499810
2026-04-15 14:42 UTC
@festal I am confused. Are you saying you consider these statements (new neural network = no hallucinations) accurate or do you think the quotes speak for themselves. If the former: How?!
Replies (2)
-
@rowmyboat@glammr.us 2026-04-15 14:45
@malteengeler @festal this is A Thing that is said by academic adjacent stuff; EBSCO says it too. They are torturing the definition of hallucinations to mean something that suits them.
-
@festal@tldr.nettime.org 2026-04-15 15:07
@malteengeler I think the lack of hallucination refers to the sources. It doesn't make up references, rather it gives you full access to the original sources. The quality summaries across papers is likely to vary, but this is like complaining about abstracts not giving you full details. Of course not, if you want that, read the paper. This interface provides a new access to them, the same way an abstract provides you with some idea whether it's worth reading the full paper.