Post #1495274

@q66 @ozzelot > "ackshually it's not in the init" response is always stupid because that's not the part that matters i do believe it sounds stupid to those regularly concerned about running parts of the systemd behemoth without the systemd's init itself, but i think you might be biased in that aspect. i have zero opinions about portability, and if i had they would be inferior to yours. however i mostly recall hearing "omg this doesn't belong in init" from non-tech people who are uninformed and genuinely concerned about the project architecture, assume no security boundaries or options to turn features on and off. this time around it's the same.