Post #1494406
2026-01-18 17:38 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@lucydev@wetdry.world 2026-01-18 17:41
@miki that's a reasonable middle ground we can somewhat agree on. I haven't seen AI-generated code being the "force multiplier" some folks swear by, especially with newer things like the config changes in pipewire last year, but i guess ymmv
-
@robotistry@mstdn.ca 2026-01-26 11:54
@miki @lucydev So it's democratizing code by giving many people the ability to do it badly. There is a real question here - something related to the balance of - harm to society and individuals of allowing enormous quantities of badly done things to be created, producing circumstances where actual expertise, understanding, and competence are devalued to the point of no longer being viable careers - benefit to society and individuals of enabling recognition of genius in a few people who would not otherwise have access to a given audience or skill. I am broadly in favour of enabling experts and competent individuals to earn a living from their expertise and competence. I am also broadly in favour of enabling everyone to develop whatever abilities and interests they have. But people with ideas for software lack time, skill, and resources, not access. If there's a demand, why is there no business writing throwaway apps for people? Will AI really be cheaper in the long run?