Elektrine lite

← Feed

@budududuroiu@hachyderm.io

Post #1490357

2026-04-06 07:52 UTC

@TeflonTrout I don't use US models, and if I did, it would only be to distil their outputs. My business helps people set up open weight models on whatever GPUs they rent (whether from hyperscalers or their own), and do distributed inference. The market was much better before big bastard labs got HIPAA and other certifications, but I can't complain, it's a fun challenge still. I'm old, so my background is in training Generative-Adversarial Networks to do unsupervised anomaly detection (think anomalous radiographies). Besides that, I use LLMs for what they're good at: fuzzing. I won't name names, for fear of litigious actors, but LLMs are great at reverse-engineering proprietary blobs that get in my way, LLMs are a great 'fitness' evaluator for evolving algorithms (instead of doing exhaustive search, you use an LLM to guide param tuning). My belief is that LLMs are here to stay, and the only way forward for us laypeople to retain some semblance of power isn't rejecting LLM use, but making them so commoditised that large-scale datacentres just become economically intractable. The OAI-Nvidia-Oracle-CoreWeave circlejerk investment is the proof that capitalism has transcended labour and "voting with your dollars" is powerless as direct action.

Replies (2)

  • @TeflonTrout@beige.party 2026-04-06 08:48

    @budududuroiu Now THERE is a nuanced and useful pov, if I do say so myself, because I 100% agree. It isn't LLMs specifically we hate, its the ones the dicks in US hype land have overstuffed and are pretending they are AI. Those, and the artless slop generators are what we hate. But using LLMs to pore over huge datasets looking for things experts like yourself have trained them to find? That is the Good Stuff. I agree that there's no stopping the bad stuff completely (just like we still get spam emails), but I sure as shit don't want anything to do with it

    Open ##1490358

  • @threatchain@mastodon.social 2026-04-06 21:15

    @budududuroiu Your approach to commoditizing inference through distributed setups is spot on - breaking the centralized chokehold is probably our best shot at keeping these tools accessible. The fuzzing applications are particularly clever, especially using LLMs as fitness functions for parameter evolution rather than brute force search.

    Open ##1490359