Post #1490151
2026-04-18 17:41 UTC
Replies (1)
-
@ngaylinn@tech.lgbt 2026-04-18 17:41
I'm very much in favor of finding a middle ground! However, I'm alarmed to find myself in the "nativist" camp, as Buckner defines it. Or, at least, I'm reluctant to say that DL learns from experience alone starting from a blank slate, or that evolution doesn't provide us with innate bias that shapes and enables our intelligence. So, I might find parts of this book quite frustrating, but hopefully in a useful way for refining my own arguments! I say the problem is we think of brains having an innate supply of facts, which seems mostly untrue. DL suggests it's also unnecessary. However, I think our innate endowment is not facts, but constraints. So, when we set up a particular ANN architecture, dataset, and training regime, that is us giving the ANN an innate endowment. That is what makes it able to learn the relevant facts. When we claim that such models learn from a blank slate, we neglect that we have done the same work that evolution does for living systems to make learning possible.