Post #1483727
2025-11-04 19:57 UTC
Replies (3)
-
@tillshadeisgone@blackqueer.life 2025-11-04 21:06
@shiri agreed that more tooling is needed. But I will just repeat what I already said about safety vs. growth. Of course it's a tricky problem, community moderation is difficult. Signing up to run an instance means you're agreeing to take on difficult problems. So I don't have much sympathy in this context because white techies have been choosing growth and reach over safety from day 1. And the rest of us have been catching hell for it the whole time. One of the many reasons the fediverse is as white as it is
-
@welshpixie@mastodon.art 2025-11-05 06:38
@shiri @tillshadeisgone 'are the fediverse evangelists trying to grow the network' - that's the problem. That's growth at the cost of safety and nobody wants that. The fediverse *shouldn't* grow if it can't do so safely, and open sign ups are not safe. This is that whole 'finding tech solutions for people problems' - the problem is all the privileged white guys with their growth mindsets who think-
-
@nu@wetdry.world 2025-11-04 20:50
@shiri @tillshadeisgone@blackqueer.life a filter like that was kind of my thinking also it would be ideal imo if the "hide posts from users under a certain age" thing could also be a per-instance setting, i.e. so an admin of an instance could turn that on only for the big instances like mas.to, but leave it off for instances with application-based signups that the admin(s) trust