Post #1473915
2026-03-02 21:59 UTC
Replies (2)
-
@Bazoogle@lemmy.world 2026-03-02 22:58
That is a different conversation. If we assume a legally trained AI strictly on data it was allowed to train on, they are saying the AI cannot hold copyright. I also don't see a loophole here, since it was denied anyway.
-
@FaceDeer@fedia.io 2026-03-02 23:09
> I shouldn't be able to create derivative media and have it be legal and public domain. Well, there's the rub - proving that AI-generated works are "derivative works" (in the legal sense). This court case had nothing to do with that. I'm aware of a few cases that have established the opposite, that AI models and their products are *not* derivative works. Do you know of any that have established that they are? > The unlicensed training itself is a rights violation, There are cases where it's been ruled fair use.