Post #1473873

2026-03-02 18:33 UTC

Gonna be fun times in courts as anyone can claim something was generated by AI even if an artist claims they created it. I wonder if this will end up limited to art or can be expanded to other copyrighted works.

Replies (2)

@Iconoclast@feddit.uk 2026-03-02 18:40

It's not generally difficult at all for an artist to prove that they are the original creator of a certain piece. My photography for example is available for anyone for free and in high resolution but I'm the only one with the full resolution pictures and RAW files. So much data is lost when a picture is compressed into .jpg format.

Open ##1473887
@KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 2026-03-02 18:49

I wonder what percentage has to be created by a human to be eligible for copyright. For example, if someone generates an AI image and then changes a few pixels, is that human-created? What if they over-paint 30% of the image? 50%? What if someone creates something in Photoshop from scratch, but they use Photoshop's in-built AI driven tools to enhance it? Either anything that uses AI in any capacity is uncopyrightable, or there has to be a line somewhere, so... Where is it?

Open ##1473888