Post #1473634
2026-03-23 20:13 UTC
[The alternative is a global end to anti-human technology.](https://lemmy.today/post/48472755)
Replies (2)
-
@maplesaga@lemmy.world 2026-03-23 20:22
>Having rejected centralised restrictions on technology then, the alternative we are left with is decentralised restriction. This could include boycotts, agreements, social stigma, parallel economies, civil disobedience and more, with the goal of limiting the development, distribution or adoption of anti-human technologies. So you require that people just boycott countries like China, stop buying their trinkets and they'll stop creating doomsday weapons?
-
@m532@lemmygrad.ml 2026-03-23 23:00
This is completely unfeasible. Convincing a bunch of people won't cut it. For this to work, you'd need to rule the whole world with an iron fist, and then there'd still be secret resistance research labs everywhere.