Post #1439839
2026-03-17 13:15 UTC
@ErikJonker
But would you trust code that has been generated and only after the fact being checked by a human? There is just no way someone actually able to sign off on that.
From what I see from vibecoders is that they focus on the happy flow but won't ever consider edge cases and 'trust the system' for that.
I'd say QC on those systems is more unthinkable than keeping a codebase 'human only'.
@Haste
Replies (1)
-
@ErikJonker@mastodon.social 2026-03-17 13:37
@odd @Haste ...but how do you keep a codebase "human only" , use of tools in software development makes sense and the difference between AI and not-AI tools can be hard to make? Or are we going to make lists of allowed and not allowed tooling? 🤔 I don't have the answers necessarily , just wondering what would actually work...