Post #1428105
2026-04-18 16:55 UTC
@AmenZwa I actually came up with two proofs that Einstein could have used that are better than the EPR argument, to show that there is no ‘quantum physics’ distinct from ordinary physics.
One is that all mathematical methods MUST reach the same result. So there cannot be ANY physics problem soluble only by ‘quantum’ methods.
The other is that any ‘quantum’ word problem has infinite exact logical equivalents in any problem domain you can name, nothing to do with physics.
Replies (1)
-
@chemoelectric@masto.ai 2026-04-18 17:06
@AmenZwa But you may be familiar with all this already. I shout it often. :) The thing I do not shout a lot but in a way am most proud of is having invented (but not yet built) a mechanical device that has the same statistical properties as a Stern-Gerlach magnet in the EPR-B experiment. At least if you augment it with a way of distributing a ball drop randomly, and some other minor details that can be dealt with by bookkeeping rather than mechanics. But mechanics could be done. To simulate +/-