Post #1407452
2026-03-07 16:48 UTC
@jschuster @cross @lindsey @krismicinski @jfdm @csgordon @jeremysiek
That's what I wonder too. In particular, the parts of UML that are *not* class diagrams. UML's biggest problem is that people equated it with the least interesting part. (Though even that part was valuable, as Doug Orleans once schooled me on.)
Replies (1)
-
@jschuster@hachyderm.io 2026-03-07 16:55
@shriramk @cross @lindsey @krismicinski @jfdm @csgordon @jeremysiek Yeah, particularly the parts of UML about structure. The more behavioral parts always seemed like a clumsy PL to me, but the parts that constrain the architecture seem like a good starting point if we want to (semi) formalize the requirements we give to LLMs.