Post #1394352
2024-06-19 04:52 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@dalias@hachyderm.io 2024-06-19 04:59
@AdrianVovk @mhoye No, rm explicitly deletes what you ask it to delete. It's not "delete everything 'managed', and oh, btw, your homedir is managed because we designed for enterprise & landlords over normal ppl".
-
@mhoye@mastodon.social 2024-06-19 14:31
@AdrianVovk @dalias Something _absolutely does_ happen "automatically" here. The Systemd team has created a program _named for managing temp files_ that automatically and invisibly started including homedirs, a "feature" that was in turn invisibly included in an update, nowhere in which the words "tmpctl" and "/home" appear in the same sentence. I have no idea what train of thought makes you believe this kind of user-hostile nonsense is reasonable, justifiable or excusable.
-
@hipsterelectron@circumstances.run 2024-06-19 15:14
@AdrianVovk @dalias @mhoye containers are landlord software too btw which is why the justification for this "feature" assuming the primacy of the container environment to make remotely any sense rankles quite a bit and further justifies the accusation. rm is something users can run to manage their own system instead of entirely delegating that functionality to a third party upstream project (vs a distro who actually represents their users) optimizing entirely for cloud hosts because they make them money, unlike actual human beings. so yeah, landlord
-
@sgf@mastodon.xyz 2024-06-23 15:49
@AdrianVovk @mhoye There's some irony that as an SRE I'm about as computer-landlord-y as it gets, but even if rm isn't a landlord conspiracy, it (and the UNIX way) is a reliability disaster. Maybe appropriate for small systems 40 years ago, but a menace today! Similarly, having a command "systemd-tmpfiles --purge" delete your home dir... and blaming the user for not thoroughly reading the docs first is aggressively user-hostile. It's a reliability nightmare, and we should be doing better!