Post #1382242
2026-04-02 17:11 UTC
@grvsmth I think there isn't actually a lot of assembly in the trainingsdata so LLMs can't really generate assembly and I'm not sure if you could do modern software dev well with assembly (ignoring the readability)
@jonny
Replies (1)
-
@grvsmth@lingo.lol 2026-04-02 17:23
@Sythelux Makes sense, but then why not a lower-level language like C/C++/C#? Probably because they're so unforgiving. And if we're going by training data and/or readability, why not just vanilla Javascript? As @jonny pointed out in their reply, it's not like it checks the types anyway. These Anthropic fraudsters helped me put my finger on something that's always bothered me about Typescript: the type checking was empty seriousness signaling for them, and I suspect for most other coders.