Post #1381725
2026-03-30 11:17 UTC
@fabienmarry not really. JPEG does support progressive rendering, but you're restricted to a subset of the full image data.
Here's a progressive JPEG https://random-stuff.jakearchibald.com/apps/partial-img-decode/?demo=fox.jpg&density=2 - it gets a first pass on screen in ~34kb. Whereas that AVIF example gets a 'frame' on screen in 800b, and a 'recognisable' version on screen in less than 9kb.
Replies (1)
-
@jaffathecake@mastodon.social 2026-03-30 11:58
@fabienmarry Maybe this explains the difference? https://mastodon.social/@jaffathecake/116318003851963941