Post #1375358
2026-04-01 13:52 UTC
Even if that is the case, I would argue the grid could sustain people charging EVs at various times during the day or setting up off-peak charging schedule than it can sustain all the AI slop being generated 24-7.
Yet the people I hear complaining about the theoretical load EVs could technically put onto the grid have nothing to say about the AI data centers that are actively raising energy costs and demanding more power than the local infrastructure can actually provide.
And really, it could sustain if we would have leadership that would support efforts to do so instead of trying to hinder renewables deployment in favor of more fossil fuels that are *also* going up in price because of their bullshit.
Replies (1)
-
@mrnobody@reddthat.com 2026-04-01 14:28
Data centers are absolutely consuming a bunch of power and we're paying for it, I agree!! California suffered brown outs from everyone charging during there day at work or at night. Idk of that's been corrected, but that's also why Trump relaxed coal and oil regulations so we could get enough power-though I hear some data centers are using jet engine turbines to supplement them smh. So while batteries can be affordable, lithium is too dangerous, and the technology hasn't quite got to the point for widespread adoption, my opinion. Solid state and sodium ion are better technologies just around the corner that offer loner range, faster charging, and safer in accidents.