Post #1374491

2026-04-12 05:23 UTC

I am correct. You allow for no other interpretation of what a liberal is besides what you say it is. Hell is used metaphorically, as it even was in religious texts. But if I believed a metaphor were concrete and real, it’s beyond obvious we’re living in it now. Please do not try to turn this into a weird religious debate because I used an incredibly common expression, about which I’ve no doubt whatsoever which you knew the meaning of.

Replies (1)

@ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 2026-04-12 05:36

I won’t, it’s a waste of both of our times and I’m not that much of a maniac, lol. But we hardly live in Hell (unless you’re in Gaza or Lebanon, idk, in that case I understand your perception of things). Again, I have defined liberal very narrowly: Western imperialists who deny it (to themselves and others), and with better PR and “softer approaches” that aren’t as obviously morally disgusting. It’s not just a catch-all term for everyone who’s danger to the global community. But assuming I’m wrong, could you provide me with at least two examples of self-proclaimed “liberals” who are representative of the ideology and tell me which things they did that you approve of and did not support the status quo of Western global oppression ?

Open ##1375294