Post #1365417
2022-12-19 17:44 UTC
@michaelchampion @cdub @danbri
• I am also not saying anything about G's W3C participation. Overall I think that it's pretty positive. I would have different priorities but it's reasonable for people to have different takes there.
• I would VERY much prefer to solve the problems we have WITH the G folks. I also don't want to get anyone in legal trouble. If that means the occasional closed doors/Chatham/safe harbour discussion, I'd be supportive.
Replies (1)
-
@robin@mastodon.social 2022-12-19 17:50
@michaelchampion @cdub @danbri So — part 1, quality. I'm not convinced that G search dominates due to "product quality" but for the sake of argument let's say it's true. Either of two things is possible: 1. Its market share more or less matches that which would result from superior quality under ideal market conditions, or 2. it doesn't. If (1), then G should be *insisting* that browsers protect search competition because anything else would be a threat.