Post #1365406

@cdub this seems like one of those unnecessary (and tedious) conflicts that take the form: 's what I'm going to interpret you to have said (since there's nothing about your word choice to stop me from outwardly feigning it as a genuine/plausible reading), even though is the thing that you were actually saying (and which, to be clear, I already know—but I'm going to force you to account for the adversarial interpretation anyway). cf @robin