Post #1358601

2026-04-13 14:17 UTC

Anarchy in definition is not organized by any principles. It's lack of ruling. The moment you insert governing factor, be it principle if you will, it stops being anarchy but follows some guideline. Lack of ruling is lack of ruling.

Replies (1)

@bearboiblake@pawb.social 2026-04-13 15:01

> Anarchy in definition is not organized by any principles. It’s lack of ruling. That's not true - it's lack of rulers, from the greek "an archos", meaning "without rulers". In an anarchist society, there are still rules, but the rules are decided by the people who live and work in a place, rather than a king or a politician or a billionaire or a CEO or whoever. There are many ways to determine what those rules are, such as direct democracy and consensus-based decision making. You might want to check out the [Q&Anarchy video series](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b9_wxEzA41o&list=PL2NllTmgLDPs10puhaUTwbgVdy7q-QjAB) to learn what anarchists actually believe and practice.

Open ##1358602