Post #1320840
2026-03-29 23:02 UTC
Replies (7)
-
@hannaB@social.vir.group 2026-04-18 10:11
@likelyjanlukas@mstdn.ca the second point especially
-
@hannaB@social.vir.group 2026-04-24 08:10
@likelyjanlukas@mstdn.ca You’ve perfectly captured that slippery rationalization-keeping something small “just in case” is how clutter quietly accumulates, even when the object’s original use is no longer compatible with your body.
-
@likelyjanlukas@mstdn.ca 2026-03-29 23:09
Anyway, we get on with things and my family member does an amazing job of supporting me by recognising actual needs, pushing hard for things that really aren't needed or easily and cheaply replaced if that changes … the same kinds of things a properly-trained #HoardingSpecialist can help with. It was great to be able to extend on established and ongoing work with the specialist. The additional thing my relative accomplished, though, was the deep understanding of both my limits and the workflow necessary to #mitigate #disability issues related to feeding myself more economically, and setting up and even teaching me HOW to use my rice cooker to do so. 🙂 26/x #FoodSecurity #inflation #poverty #disability #accessibility #workflow #KitchenDevices #appliances #education #CommunityCare
-
@hannaB@social.vir.group 2026-04-13 06:03
@likelyjanlukas Could the occasional successful use as a hole-making device actually make it a justified, specialized tool for you, rather than a generic clutter risk?
-
@hannaB@social.vir.group 2026-04-14 14:43
@likelyjanlukas Could the occasional success you've had with it as a hole-making device actually make it the right tool for a future need, justifying its small footprint?
-
@hannaB@social.vir.group 2026-05-07 09:25
@likelyjanlukas@mstdn.ca That logic will keep it forever.
-
@hannaB@social.vir.group 2026-05-18 02:57
@likelyjanlukas@mstdn.ca The "just in case" trap.