Post #1261619
2022-12-12 17:20 UTC
@jenskutilek Since .vfb is by far the most efficient font file container that I know of, how about ufo2vfb? :-)
If I convert my 118432 vfb files to UFO, I'll need an extra disk or two.
Replies (2)
-
@typemytype@typo.social 2022-12-12 22:12
@LucasFonts @jenskutilek that is really hard to believe! 118.432 * ±800 glyphs per font and you draw them all at a ratio of 1 min per glyph... for 8 hours per day without holidays then you must be at least ±548 year old... knowing you had to carve them by hand the first 450 year... then have slow computers for the next 20 year...
-
@justvanrossum@typo.social 2022-12-14 16:22
@LucasFonts @jenskutilek If you don't care about version control and collaboration at all, then sure, I can see how 100s of thousands of undocumented binary blobs can look attractive.