Post #1251374
2026-04-07 20:20 UTC
@xahteiwi hah! I swear I've re-read your original toot before posting and didn't spot that. Or parsed it as "with" instead of "in", idk. Sorry.
Replies (1)
-
@xahteiwi@mastodon.social 2026-04-07 20:50
@zhenech Hmm got me thinking, is "on" clearer than "in", in this context?