Post #1249784

@letoams @huitema @pedromj @paulehoffman @rsalz The basic dividing line is very simple: I endorse various _good_ things. I oppose endorsement of various _bad_ things. I'm not the one here issuing a confusing mixture of (1) acknowledging "strong consensus that pure PQ should not be recommended at this time", (2) claiming that it's good to issue RFCs on "pure" (non-hybrid) PQ, and (3) claiming that such RFCs wouldn't be endorsement despite prominently claiming "consensus of the IETF community".