Post #1240720
2025-10-27 10:57 UTC
Replies (4)
-
@wanwizard@mastodon.scot 2025-10-27 13:23
@ArneBab @davep @yawnbox This is 2025, and there are still large ISP's with no intention to offer IPv6.
-
@reconbot@toot.cafe 2025-10-27 13:25
@ArneBab @davep I know that it's not a conspiracy that we don't use IPv6 very much, but I also feel in my bones that it's a conspiracy that we don't use IPv6 very much.
-
@billiglarper@rollenspiel.social 2025-10-27 13:30
@ArneBab @davep @yawnbox Right now, Jitsi doesn't run video calls reliably. Even if it's just a handful of users, all within a few km of Frankfurt. (And we are not even using it for video conferencing. Most are voice only, perhaps 1-2 persons sharing a screen.)
-
@dryak@mstdn.science 2025-10-27 14:21
@ArneBab @davep @yawnbox Note that in the specific use case of Signal: given their threat model, "direct peer-to-peer connections by default" are not desirable. You'll need to bounce the audio&video traffic by default to make it more costly to infere who is talking with whom. So the fact that working NAT and IPv6 help rely less on TURN servers won't help decentralize that much.