Post #1214401
2026-02-28 17:30 UTC
@miguelgrinberg I've had to e.g. ask Claude Code to credit Gemini as the LLM tool I used, so transparency is feasible and IMO helps. People who want nothing to do with LLM generated code, reviewers, all get a clear signal.
The DevGuide policy doesn't mention disclosure of or crediting LLM tools. I expect more contributions have been with them. If your position is that it should always be disclosed, I can agree to that to a point. Say, when a significant part of the code was generated by an LLM.
Replies (1)
-
@miguelgrinberg@mstdn.social 2026-02-28 17:34
@danzin How would I know how significant is the part of the code that was generated with an LLM if there is no requirement to disclose every specific use? That is exactly the point I'm making in the article. I can guess that the use of coding agents is larger than those 8 commits, but because there is no disclosure requirement, I will never be able to calculate the percentage of code that was touched by these tools. Again, if you are going to go down this road, you have to be transparent.