Post #1209874
2026-03-23 19:31 UTC
@RobJLow FWIW the book has it right, so the error must be the reviewer's.
Replies (1)
-
@RobJLow@mathstodon.xyz 2026-03-24 13:40
@robinhouston A relief, because it would have been very worrying if the biographer got that wrong. But then you worry about how reliable the review is in other respects. (Which wouldn't be a problem if it couldn't affect the livelihood/reputation of the biographer....)