Post #1202066
2026-04-06 18:02 UTC
@jornfranke I encourage you to reread the article because it addresses all your objections, especially the "why did they not break a small key".
I will add that the cryptography experts are actually very confident in the security of lattices. https://keymaterial.net/2025/12/13/a-very-unscientific-guide-to-the-security-of-various-pqc-algorithms/
Replies (2)
-
@jornfranke@social.anoxinon.de 2026-04-06 18:04
@filippo I found no good argument for this. There is just a bogus comment that nobody asked the Manhatten project to create a small nuclear explosion. It has nothing to do with the topic and they of course did various tests and experiments to validate what they are doing. It is a typical distraction from the fact that they even cannot solve small problems on QC.
-
@jornfranke@social.anoxinon.de 2026-04-06 18:05
@filippo Cryptographic experts might be confident in the security of lattice, but I would be not confident in their secure implementation. It took decades to get the implementation right for classical algorithms and they are still often wrongly implemented. This is a big security problem.