Post #1151346
2026-04-14 22:16 UTC
@huitema@social.secret-wg.org @djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to @paulehoffman@infosec.exchange @rsalz@ioc.exchange I know this, but one must be active in a WG to convince enough members to vote for something like adding some text. It is not easy to be so active sporadically. It is much more feasible to write concerns in an I-D ---a formal document with familiar structure--- and discuss it in some MLs and/or meetings.
Replies (1)
-
@huitema@social.secret-wg.org 2026-04-14 22:26
@pedromj@mastodon.social @djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to @paulehoffman@infosec.exchange @rsalz@ioc.exchange We are heading towards a situation where the ML-KEM key exchange draft will be published, probably in about a year. I would much prefer to see a warning in the text itself, and I think that can be achieved. After that, the IETF will have published 2 documents, hybrid ML-KEM and naked ML-KEM. If we follow Dan's reasoning, we can expect the US Gov to encourage "naked", which they might be able to break. We will be in the domain of opinions, not standards.