Post #1137830
2026-04-13 22:48 UTC
@pedromj@mastodon.social @djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to @paulehoffman@infosec.exchange @rsalz@ioc.exchange I am really not sure that publishing more words would help counter propaganda by the bad faith actors that Dan fears. If the WG does decide to publish the ML-KEM TLS draft, strong warnig would help somewhat. Changing the registration option of the hybrid key exchange algorithms to recommended=Y would also help. But propaganda is countered by public speech, not so much by standard actions.
Replies (1)
-
@pedromj@mastodon.social 2026-04-14 08:49
@huitema@social.secret-wg.org @djb@mastodon.cr.yp.to @paulehoffman@infosec.exchange @rsalz@ioc.exchange Some one cannot force other one to add the warning to their I-D, but can write the warning in a new I-D and find enough support for it to make the previous I-D to integrate the new I-D ---hence adding the warnin---, or live separately to help engineers know about the problem.