Post #1126917

RE: https://mstdn.social/@sensiblequiet/116361490052934697 Wait, WHAT.?! An environmentalist organization looking for an “AI lead”..? Bloody fuck… I knew Greenpeace's top is pretty heavily corporatized, but THIS much? Maaaybe it's possible to define ethical use as no use— > You'll have: proven success implementing enterprise data and AI governance frameworks. > How Success is Measured: Lead implementation and responsible adoption of out-of-the-box AI capabilities within enterprise platforms. Ah. Nope. Use is mandatory. And ethics or sustainability for the AI providers completely optional, to boot. 🤦‍♀️ Bonus: > You'll have: Strong understanding of responsible AI principles, AI governance, and platform-embedded AI capabilities. A strong interest in how data and AI can power environmental and social impact. … if they ACTUALLY understood this they won't be taking the frigging job, dammit. 😭 > How Success is Measured: Ensure data and AI platforms comply with privacy, security, and regulatory obligations. 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 This bubble cannot explode soon enough. - Job offer and referenced guidelines from Greenpeace Asia–Pacific in particular (which is… not a little region). Does NOT bode well for the rest of the organization though. PS: yes, this DOES explicitly include genAI tools; there's not even the "not all AI is genAI" “excuse” here… #NoAI #StopGenAI