Post by @gav@cawfee.club

2026-10-02 07:08 UTC

@Myles@poa.st @caekislove@caekis.love @admin@detroitriotcity.com @FreeinTX@poa.st whether you agree or not those have been understood to be the same thing the entire time, according to one of the smoke pit guys the logistics for maintaining a staging base in kuwait and the fleet headquarters in bahrain(i think), whether thats a victory or not its a positive achievement to removing us presence if thats the goal. you also made alot about aircraft carriers not being sunk but they had to move further away than is effective (again smoke pit guy but ive heard it elsewhere), so this isnt somehow a failiure or a reasonable thing to mock thos in the thread about there arent any links in this thread, the thread quoted, or the thread quoted in the quoted thread, youll have to repost them

Replies (1)

@Myles@poa.st 2026-10-02 12:52

@gav@cawfee.club @caekislove@caekis.love @admin@detroitriotcity.com @FreeinTX@poa.st If the argument is "The conflict could be going much better for the US," then yeah, sure, obviously. That applies to every conflict. When the conflict started, I thought it was going to be a disaster because that's how the analysis and Wargames played out. Turns out the US military can actually learn things. If you want to say that the conflict shouldn't have happened, then I agree. I'm on record being against the strikes on Iran in late 2025. But that's not the argument that the goat fucker simps were making at the beginning, and it's not the argument being made now, except after days of them moving the goalposts.

Open ##5332710